Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragoon X Omega

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 03:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dragoon X Omega and Dragoon X Omega II

These articles do not establish notability through citation of reliable sources. Also, Dragoon X Omega II copypastes content from an external site, http://datacrystal.org/wiki/Dragoon_X_Omega_II . Megata Sanshiro (talk) 10:51, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. —Megata Sanshiro (talk) 11:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 11:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of sources. Yes, they are extremely well made hacks, and probably quite popular, but that does NOT make them notable. I would love to see someone dig up some true RSes about the games, but as it stands now there's nothing on the pages that say they are notable. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 14:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sadly true per above.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:18, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - while the hack may be well made, it still fails notability. Doing a quick check reveals not even 1 RS for notability. That it exists can be verified, but even so we don't have articles on every single fan-made work in existence.陣内 _Jinnai 18:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Hold on I'll see what I can do about getting articles that prove notability. I can get into contact with Sliver X -- if anyone knows of articles about DXO, it'll be him. If I can't provide any good ones, then I won't complain about the deletion (though I will die a little bit inside). Flonnezilla (talk) 00:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nevermind. I haven't been able to talk to Sliver X yet, and I've decided that I don't want to bug him about it. Go ahead and delete the article; if I get some good sources at some point I'll recreate it. Fair enough? Flonnezilla (talk) 23:02, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on I am just want to expanded it, even I am not good in English, I am just copy from copypastes and reedit it the article. If you wish to delete it, just delete it. Sorry about that. Woad85 (talk) 07:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.