Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DrEd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 06:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DrEd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

history of almost entirely ip edits is a bit suspicious. There is one article in Der Speigel that mentions it, but I can't read german. I was unable to find non-promotional non-press-release sources to establish WP:N on google or google news. UseTheCommandLine (talk) 02:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:CORP for lack of sufficient coverage by multiple independent reliable sources. The article in Der Spiegel is indeed significant coverage, and Der Spiegel is a reliable source, but one such article is not enough. The article supplies no others, and I was unable to find any coverage at all in Google News Archive. (The title DrEd is hard to search - I kept getting links to the Dred Scott decision - but adding modifiers such as "London" or "internet healthcare" did not provide any sources either.) --MelanieN (talk) 14:27, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the sources aren't reliable enough and I see this is an attempt to get free publicity in Wikipedia, also I'm not sure the business is real at all 90.203.183.85 (talk) 19:49, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:CORP. Tiggerjay (talk) 05:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, DrEd is a real business and I have used them before. I came on here to find out more about online doctors and it's kind of worrying to find some Americans have deleted an article on a prominent business in topical European business area. DrEd is on German TV quite often as what they do is not allowed in Germany yet they can practice it from the EU. If you guys took about one more minute, you would have found this. https://www.dred.com/de/Deutsche-aerzte-stellen-Diagnosen-uebers-Internet.html https://www.dred.com/de/Ferndiagnose-von-der-Insel.html https://www.dred.com/de/Wie-sinnvoll-ist-eine-Arztpraxis-im-Internet.html https://www.dred.com/de/Online-Praxis-Behandlung-ohne-Arzt-Besuch.html All major outlets, so is it wise to put the article back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.158.2.90 (talk) 00:04, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.