Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dove Data

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:30, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dove Data

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, advertisement written by an SPA. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 03:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - Promo bs that belongs elsewhere. –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:42, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even if this was notable, it would need to be nearly completely rewritten to be encyclopedic. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can find no independent sources other than a routine contract bid. A firm going about its business, but of no encyclopaedic notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 07:58, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Little to no coverage in reliable secondary sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 16:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:ORG and is Promotional.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:36, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.