Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double double coffee
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Double-double (disambiguation). Xclamation point 00:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Double double coffee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:OR, provides no sources. May also fail WP:NOTE . — `CRAZY`(lN)`SANE` 07:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and WP:V.Oli OR Pyfan! 07:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete delete. Soft redirect to Wiktionary per S Marshall. Being a Canadian, I am quite familiar with the term and it is listed in the urban dictionary, but Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:41, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Soft redirect to Wiktionary, surely. This plausible search term should not be a redlink, but dictionary definitions don't belong here.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 11:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge & redir to
coffee- worth a mention in the parent Article. Is a personal preference on how I like my coffee Notable... no, Dangit! Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 12:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- yeah, Double-double (disambiguation) looks better as the target Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 07:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Double-double (disambiguation) which already includes all this information. Pburka (talk) 17:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Double double redirect – to the abovementioned dab page. Apparently the user has forgotten the basketball term of the same name. Plausible search term. MuZemike 00:39, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Objection. In the first place, WP:DAB clearly states that dictionary definitions are not welcome. Also, what are you planning to link the dab item to? Surely not Tim Hortons. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:41, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.