Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double-nosed pointer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:56, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Double-nosed pointer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced orphan, fails GNG. This seems to be a recessive trait found in some breeds of pointer, not worthy of an article. Cavalryman (talk) 04:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete on GNG. Although Google Books lists 8 books that have a passing mention somewhere in a sentence, there is no actual material further on them. The article has gone nowhere since its creation in 2013 because further material does not exist. William Harristalk 07:57, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:23, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a bifid nose is an anomoly (aka birth defect) typically resulting from a cleft palate. WP is not in the practice of promoting WP:FRINGE. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 14:43, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.