Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Sayenga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 03:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Sayenga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essentially unsourced WP:BLP tagged as failing WP:BIO since 2008. I don't see coverage that would meet WP:BIO. I'm not sure whether any of his various accomplishments qualify. Sandstein 10:39, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I really want to say keep here, since I think the story of the wire industry is of historical interest, and the subject seems to be of some repute in the field - the ASCE did choose him to edit their volume on it, after all. However, Gsearching couldn't come up with the requisite level of coverage we usually like to see. Ray^Talk 16:33, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not much in the way of sources, Notability issues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eskimo.the (talk • contribs) 16:21, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.