Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direct imports

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 00:53, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Direct imports

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced personal essay Rathfelder (talk) 22:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not seeing any evidence that this is a recognized term/concept as described. When I search for "direct imports" on Google Scholar, most sources seem to be talking about imports directly into country C from country A, rather than A -> B -> C. Colin M (talk) 21:48, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MADEUP, WP:TNT, and WP:MILL. Every budding entrepreneur has come up with some version of cutting out the middle man. This essay isn't even wrong. Bearian (talk) 15:21, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't pass Wp:GNG. Funnygooster (talk) 15:04, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked sock. MER-C 16:52, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article needs to be expanded. Barca (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not verifiable per Wikipedia's standards.4meter4 (talk) 12:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.