Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DimML
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WJBscribe (talk) 19:27, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- DimML (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not seem to pass WP:NSOFTWARE or general notability guideline. {C A S U K I T E T} 20:18, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:13, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Couldn't find any evidence of notability. OSborn arfcontribs. 01:58, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. No coverage found that would indicate encyclopedic relevance. --Michig (talk) 08:06, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.