Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digivolution (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Digimon (creature)#Digivolution. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:19, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Digivolution

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A long article, but a long article on a non-notable concept. Made up entirely of in-universe distinctions, lists and trivia. This concept has no real-world notability. No reliable sources are cited. J Milburn (talk) 16:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Long, rambling, incredibly detailed list of creature evolutions that are far from unique to Digimon: most similar shows have the same thing, and calling them digivolutions instead of evolutions like in Pokemon doesn't really make them something different. Plus it's entirely 'sourced' to episodes of the show. This is the kind of thing for which fan wikis exist, and Wikipedia is not one. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:07, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Digimon (creature)#Digivolution. Another possibility would be to redirect to the main Digimon page.--70.24.208.34 (talk) 22:48, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. Neelix (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question? what is your view of the redirection suggestions?--70.24.208.34 (talk) 01:04, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.