Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital motion X-ray

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 06:30, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Digital motion X-ray

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure what else to say after reading this article, except ... WP:TNT applies unless this article can be merged or redirected somewhere. Steel1943 (talk) 06:12, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite if possible, otherwise delete: I can't help thinking there is something worthwhile hidden (very well hidden!) in here. Somebody who knows the topic needs to go through those references and use them to write an actual article. Failing that, I don't see any point in keeping it as it is...--Gronk Oz (talk) 08:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the nominator. The subject seems notable [1], the article is not worth keeping. Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 08:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the content of the article creator's user page, DMX Works (talk · contribs), tells us everything that we need to know. Delete without prejudice to a non-advertisement being written, possibly not even at this title (as all too often these articles tend to be company-invented names for things). Uncle G (talk) 11:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Medicine, and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:53, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: a thinly-veiled ad by a SPA COI. The common name for this technology seems to be Dynamic Digital Radiography. "Digital motion X-ray" may be a trademark owned by the equipment maker for which the author works. Owen× ☎ 22:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.