Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Novel Markup Language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Novel Markup Language

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) No worthwhile redirect targets. czar 05:39, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 05:40, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep based on the sources in the jp-wiki. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:31, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What sources? It has none. czar 07:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unsourced, fails WP:GNG. Digital Novel Markup Language [ja] doesn't have any sources either. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 10:17, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I added a Visual_novel#Engines section to the visual novel article and made a subsection about DNML there. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 15:21, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is an interesting technology but sadly after digging around for notable references I can find none really (save the one primary source). Unlike some other systems (where sources are hard to find due to them being in languages other than English), this one does not seem to have been very popularly used (and thus no one wrote about it either). 50.53.1.33 (talk) 20:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.