Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Monitor Power Management
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Digital Visual Interface. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Digital Monitor Power Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet notability guidelines, is completely a stub (and could be merged into the Digital Visual Interface article) and the only source is primary - a technical document describing the standard. Mattnad (talk) 17:00, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete/Merge Trivial. --Cybercobra (talk) 21:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Digital Visual Interface Traxs7 (Talk) 23:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. Not really notable enough on its own. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 02:47, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Please explain why you haven't filed an AfD against DPMS, which is basically the same thing (except analog). AshtonBenson (talk) 20:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, that's not a bad idea. It's not that notable on its own either. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I'll get around to it eventually. Mattnad (talk) 21:12, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Please explain why you haven't filed an AfD against DPMS, which is basically the same thing (except analog). AshtonBenson (talk) 20:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with DPMS, since DMPM is basically the digital version of DPMS. I should have just created a new section in DPMS rather than creating a new article. AshtonBenson (talk) 17:02, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.