Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Media Wire
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Digital Media Wire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seemingly open and shut case of a company with a basically unacceptable article and the best I found was this, this and this. Pinging the only still active users Tedder and Dawn Bard. SwisterTwister talk 07:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Issue tags for a long time, COI, obvious. tedder (talk) 14:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I try not to let the quality or citation issues with an article sway and AfD discussion (since its the topic that's is either notable, verifiable,etc), but there's just not anything out there but a few self-referential pieces. --69.204.153.39 (talk) 17:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.