Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Element

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dominion Enterprises. MBisanz ^talk 16:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Element

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page has been tagged since July 2010 as possibly non-notable. There's a ton of advertising on the page, and there seems to be a lack of any notable references. I think this fails WP:CORP. mikeman67 (talk) 18:56, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 19:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 19:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I'm not seeing any obvious signs of improvement here. Pinging VQuakr and Mindmatrix. SwisterTwister talk 04:36, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Dominion Enterprises. Not enough here to merit a merge, but a sentence in the article on the parent company is probably due. VQuakr (talk) 04:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:50, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is mostly a source problem. Initially, the sources looked like a good mix. But Digital Element isn't even really mentioned in the ones that would be most reliable/verifiable, and I can't find any others.--69.204.153.39 (talk) 02:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom and above editors. Not enough in the searches to show they meet either WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:26, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.