Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Command System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was boldly merged to Model train control systems by ThaddeusB. Digital Command System will become a redirect to preserve the editing history. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Command System

Procedural nom, contested prod. Unreferenced. A search for references has failed to find significant coverage (only trivial or incidental coverage) in reliable sources in order to comply with notability requirements. "Digital Command System" appears to be a genetic term anyway and not unique to this non-notable product. McWomble (talk) 13:53, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources found with good coverage Arma virumque cano (talk) 14:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC) This user has since been blocked as a sockpuppet. - ALLST✰R▼^echo _{wuz here @} 19:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This user's primarily contributions to Wikipedia have been to !vote (primarily delete) on dozens of AfDs approximately 1 minute apart from each other. See AN thread --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ appears to a notable control system within the model train community. Could possibly be merged with Trainmaster Command Control (also nominated for deletion) into one article Model train control systems --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and BOLDly created Model train control systems and merged this info there. This article needs redirected to preserve the edit history. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:26, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That seems like a wise course of action. Surely these are verifiable and significant in that context and merging these will save the information and keep all of them from being listed here in dribs and drabs. Drawn Some (talk) 14:49, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The threshold for notability is significant coverage in reliable sources. The article does not even assert the importance or significance of the subject let alone provide reliable sources to support such a claim. McWomble (talk) 16:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ per Arma virumque cano. Cosmomancer (talk) 16:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this user has been indefinitely blocked as a probable sock puppet of User:McWomble--ThaddeusB (talk) 23:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Model train control systems to preserve edit history as suggested by ThaddeusB - good work! There are a few Gbook hits, and interestingly the text in Webster's Facts and Phrases‎ seems to be taken from the Wikipedia article (for what it's worth). Sufficently notable for inclusion in the general article. Power.corrupts (talk) 20:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Power.corrupts.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 21:29, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.