Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DigiDestined

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 16:33, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Digidestined

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think Wikipedia accepts fancruft. There is no real world information to satisfy WP:GNG. Just plot summary. Fangusu (talk) 01:58, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Probably delete unless this can be moved elsewhere as my searches found nothing to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Im fine with character lists, but this one is a mess of WP:OR it also overlaps with other character lists. Delete per WP:TNT and WP:OR. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Is an explanation really needed? Its like something you'd find on a fan-based Wikia. Which is why those exist in the first place. —Kirt^Message 06:20, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as completely unreferenced. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:07, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.