Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diborane (data page)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Touched base with a wikidata admin who thought there wasn't much suitable to transwiki. If anyone with more expertise than I wishes to explore that path further, let me know and I will facilitate (undelete for transwiki, etc etc.) Daniel (talk) 09:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diborane (data page)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Data page that mainly consists of question marks rather than actual values. The three only values available are also contained in the chembox of Diborane (section Thermochemistry). Leyo 11:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Leyo 11:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as useless. I am surprised that about 5 views a day are happening. Deleting will stop those readers from wasting their time. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as useless indeed. Unless someone wants to populate the whole document with things that are NOT in the mainpage already. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 11:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as useless. PianoDan (talk) 17:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as useless per WP:DIRECTORY. Caleb Stanford (talk) 05:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Don't data pages belong on Wikidata? Phil Bridger (talk) 12:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Most of these pre-date wikidata, some probably by almost a decade. Wikidata is for data, en.wikipedia should present that in a contextualized readable way, so no, I do not think that datapages belong on wikidata. Whether they (still) belong on en.wikipedia is another question. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 12:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you that this page doesn't belong on Wikipedia, but I don't see how that means that such data don't belong on Wikidata. I have just found Wikidata:Q407684, which seems to fulfil the function intended for this page. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed that moving to Wikidata is a good idea. Caleb Stanford (talk) 13:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, - this material doesn't belong on wikipedia - or as mentioned above by Caleb Stanford, move to wikidata. Deathlibrarian (talk) 05:57, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki whatever is missing from https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q407684 on Wikidata. — Charles Stewart (talk) 22:11, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.