Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devon Dorrity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 06:58, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Devon Dorrity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously a BLP PROD - I still think it is. The references are his official site and I believe a site that's got some of his scultptures. He does do awesome work, I have to admit - but a google news search reveals nothing. I've expanded to "Devon Dorrity Sculpture" and that seems to only pull his site and some tumblr hits. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 18:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 05:19, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of secondary sources Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:38, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass WP:GNG, simply a competent person and we are not linked in.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 04:28, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks the coverage in reliable independent sources for WP:NOTEBLP. Fails WP:CREATIVE. --Bejnar (talk) 04:32, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.