Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devika Rotawan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 15:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Devika Rotawan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a case of WP:BLP1E. The individual is covered almost exclusively for her role in the 2008 Mumbai attacks and her reaction to it in its aftermath, she otherwise remains likely to be a low-profile individual, and it's not clear that she had a particularly significant role in the attack (she was a victim of a crime and served as a witness in the ensuing trial). — Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:45, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:45, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:45, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the nomination statement identifies two separate events, both of which are significant (e.g. still covered ten years later) and her role appears to be both substantial and well documented. WP:BLP1E requires all of the factors to be met, and due to reliable sources covering her for more than one event (the attack and her role in the trial), and the events being significant and her roles well documented, a standalone article appears to be supported. And she is still receiving coverage, e.g. TimesNowNews 2020, The Better India 2018, Hindustan Times 2018, so she also does not appear to have remained WP:LOWPROFILE since the trial. Beccaynr (talk) 03:53, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.