Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deviant Sound Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:35, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deviant Sound Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bringing this to AfD as a PROD was disputed. I can see no notability, but would prefer a consensus decision. Peridon (talk) 16:50, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Almost a speedy a7 deletion. I found no good independent coverage for this company. duffbeerforme (talk) 00:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 05:34, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per duffbeerforme and WP:Notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iglooflame (talk • contribs) 06:47, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable, non-verifiable. No reliable sources to indicate notability, and none for any of the artists listed in the article - indeed, neither this label nor its artists appear to have any independent third-party coverage at all, reliable or not. (Even Discogs, where you'd expect someone to have uploaded at least one record from such a big roster of artists, draws a total blank.) Fosse8 (talk) 09:43, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – After searching, not finding third-party coverage in reliable sources. Mostly just passing mentions in directories and social networking sites. The topic appears to fail WP:GNG at this time. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.