Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desktop alert (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 05:10, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Desktop alert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am not sure of its notability but certainly it violates WP:No Original Research. It is waiting for sources since exactly 5 years; which means either those sources do not exist or the creator of the article does not bother to add them. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:12, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete—No google scholar hits on "desktop alert"+"information logistics". Nothing in google books. ghits are just on many clones of the en.WP article. No indication of notability. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 03:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:18, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per comment above. Unreferenced and possibly WP:NEO. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:16, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.