Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Designer (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:37, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Designer (song)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG as the coverage I find is all trivial or promotional. No chart and only claim to notability is the number of YouTube views which is not part of the notability criteria. Would recommend redirect as an WP:ATD based on the NSONG guideline. CNMall41 (talk) 16:53, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Music, Popular culture, and India. CNMall41 (talk) 16:54, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – 100 million views is really impressive, passes in WP:NMUSIC. Svartner (talk) 18:45, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no inherent notability based on on views and nothing in NMUSIC that even talks about YouTube views.--CNMall41 (talk) 19:13, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is not based on policy. At all. λ NegativeMP1 20:38, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nomination; YouTube views is not a notable metric under WP:NSONG. MayhemStoppingBy (talk) 18:58, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet WP:NSONG. No sources that cover the song in detail from what I can see. Might change my vote if any sources outside of this page are found that provide WP:SIGCOV regarding the song. λ NegativeMP1 20:40, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Pretty much as explained in the nom. I wasn't able to find sources that cover the song in-depth. Existing sources are just routine collaboration/launch mentions. Notability isn't shown under WP:NSONG. EmilyR34 (talk) 04:46, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails on WP:NSONG mainly in lacking WP:SIGCOV. Iljhgtn (talk) 04:09, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Current refs are all routine, and while 100m views on YouTube is impressive, it's important to note that it's not a criteria at WP:NSONG because views are not audited and can be bought. Happy to change my vote if sigcov is found and introduced. Nil🥝 04:54, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.