Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Halpern

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Derek Halpern

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see the sources adding up to the general notability guidelines.

Interview in Fast Company - the interview isn't about him, it is him giving advice on maximizing your blogs ROI (Return on Investment?)
The second is a short article with a link to a video (which I an not going to watch, but I will presume is by him) in Entrepreneur, but I Really don't think that this "article provides the depth of coverage required for a BLP.
1. Also worth noting, the author of this is also a "contributor", his day job is "CEO of The GoodBrain Digital Studios".
Since it says Forbes it seems like it should be a solid, however it looks to me like it is more of a posting by a Forbes "contributor", and not so much an actual article in the magazine. The author (who has studied journalism) runs a "strategy consulting firm" (I really don't know what that is), so I highly doubt this has gone through the editorial oversight required for a BLP source. Especially since the caveat says "Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own."
The fourth Small Business Owners: Top 50 Twitter Influencers Worth Following - I really think it should be self evident why this is not an appropriate source for establishing notability (although it is used appropriately in the article). kelapstick^(bainuu) 12:49, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and move to user space as draft. Author clearly tried to meet WP standards but this article just isn't there yet. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 13:12, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:BASIC, can only find questionable or self-published sources about him, sources referenced in article are either only trivial mentions or unreliable. Esquivalience ^t 13:44, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.