Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deposition Source

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Samir 20:06, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deposition Source

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 23:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, maybe G11 speedy delete as WP:SPAM. I find nothing to suggest this is notable at all. It also appears to be defunct: the external link leads to some sort of unrelated website offering cash advances.--Arxiloxos (talk) 00:11, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 20:14, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Whpq. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 20:34, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.