Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demo 98
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:48, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Demo 98 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:40, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep The section of WP:music referred to discusses unreleased material. This particular demo was released. RadManCF ☢ open frequency 21:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It also says that albums are generally notable which doesn't mean always. Joe Chill (talk) 21:15, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply] - If the album is to be deleted for non-notability than the nomination should be phrased appropriately and the correct rationale should be used. In this case the nominator's rationale is not applicable. This AfD is illegitimate and should be closed as "moot." --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:09, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- What? His is this illegitimate or inappropriately phrased? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Despite the use of the term "demo" in the article text, some easy good faith research reveals that this item later became a commercially-released album. So if you think this commercially released album article should be deleted, then it is illegitimate to say it should be deleted because it is a demo. Seems pretty simple to me. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- What? His is this illegitimate or inappropriately phrased? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.