Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta 9 (computer game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per G11 by JzG. (non-admin closure) MrKIA11 (talk) 19:28, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delta 9 (computer game)

Not quite a CSD G11, but a non-notable game anyway. StaticGull Talk 13:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:47, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:47, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 16:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - looks like spam to me. --Evb-wiki (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Only narrowly short of G11? — Alan^✉ 18:32, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
G11 — I respectfully disagree with the above comment. It does meet G11 and is certainly spam. MuZemike (talk) 21:03, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per G11. RC-0722 ^361.0/1 23:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is just the start of the page. The game is still in development and I would like to be able to write the story then be able to put it somewhere. --Sabre070 (talk) 01:27, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You could transwiki to, say, Wikia; or you could ask for userfication. Hope that helps. MuZemike (talk) 23:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's spam -- Whpq (talk) 16:55, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. Bordering on adspam. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 17:33, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is a very high chance that this is a copyright violation - see [1]. The article here on WP was created on 21 AUG. Although the page I linked to says that the initial post was made on 22 AUG, someone replied to the original post there on 19 AUG, so maybe there is a glitch in their software? Even if it is not a copyvio, it's still spam. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - tagged as G11. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.