Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defected Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:27, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Defected Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable record label of house music. No references; no reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. -- Wikipedical (talk) 04:05, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no reliable sources to meet the WP:GNG. Vcessayist (talk) 00:23, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Seems notable; references that can be added:[1][2][3]. Peter James (talk) 22:48, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources identified by User:Peter James demonstrate notability. --Michig (talk) 06:27, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 01:09, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - additional write-ups in Billboard [4][5]. Gongshow ^Talk 20:33, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.