Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decocidio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 05:48, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decocidio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a significant establishment. Enthdegree (talk) 00:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It also appears that they are using this Wikipedia article as their homepage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enthdegree (talk • contribs) 00:39, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Do you have proof of the use of this article as a 'homepage'. I can't find any internet domain that refers to this article. Also, I disagree with the remark on significance. I have the slight impression that the critique presented, is based rather upon ideology than content. One can hardly predict how this group of hactivist will develop and the information presented in the article is strictly based on documented facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.236.130.200 (talk) 12:18, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. In the article they included a link to a mirror of the page they uploaded to a website they hacked: Mirror Enthdegree (talk) 13:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

comment mirrors of websites hacked by hacking groups seem to me to be legitimately and essentially inclusable in articles about the hacking groups. Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 04:27, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Although the article isn't much more than a stub right now, the subject group does appear to be notable, on the basis of several independent reliable sources. Richwales (talk · contribs) 22:20, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

keep This seems to be uncontroversially linked to from the European Climate Exchange article, which fact, along with multiple sources in many languages, seems to say it's notable. Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 04:24, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.