Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/December EP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 09:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December EP

article on ep with no coverage in independant reliable souces, Duffbeerforme (talk) 19:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —--Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 19:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete: Nothing notable about this at all. Refs are blogs, a promo and a fansite, all failing WP:RS. Zero Gnews hits. Toddst1 (talk) 01:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: insufficient 3rd party coverage WP:NALBUMS. JamesBurns (talk) 05:33, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No one seems to understand that this is the bands official (and hopefully temporary) website. Though a blog, it is still a valid source of information. Also, I've added (and another person) more links from other sites, providing validity to coverage. I shall continue to provide more until my point that it is a very young EP and still needs time for more reviews to surface, as well as prove its notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EOA3928 (talk • contribs) 17:47, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:19, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no reliable independent sources. A-Kartoffel (talk) 07:16, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NALBUMS. Even if the article was sourced reliably, without charting or garnering significant media coverage, it will remain non-notable. TheJazzDalek (talk) 19:33, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Because I'm fighting a losing battle, and can't possibly sway anyone. EOA3928 (talk) 22:21, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete per above. Non notable. Deletion Mutation 16:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC) N.B. !vote of sockpuppet of blocked user struck through. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:42, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.