Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeAuthThis (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:50, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- DeAuthThis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable podcast. Sourced by itself. Notability is not inhereted from a notable guest. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:45, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Missed this the first time around. Arguably eligible for speedy deletion under A7. Interviewing a notable person does not make your podcast notable and there's no other reason I can see why this meets the guidelines. Zachlipton (talk) 04:59, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless sources demostrating notability roll around; currently there are none. Hairhorn (talk) 03:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.