Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:23, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dawko

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only references are their own Twitter and Youtube. Just enough to rescue it from a BLP PROD but not an indication of any notability. There is an unsourced, an dubious, claim of a high number of subscribers and views that are not matched by a look at his YouTube page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable --Devokewater @ 10:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable youtuber.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:03, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about him. Search results return only mentions of him. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 08:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.