Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Reader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 12:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David Reader

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Routine coverage here doesn't pass WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 22:18, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and Cambodia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:32, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO. A search mainly yields coverage of namesakes. LibStar (talk) 00:02, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For the reasons stated in the nomination. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:08, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it currently fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 19:03, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. NYC Guru (talk) 14:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG, NPERSON, and BIO. Shawn Teller (talk) 01:13, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.