Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lethbridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Lethbridge

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced apart from one refence to a faculty page. Doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG Idolwyld (talk) 10:13, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:55, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. All I can find are three reviews of only one of his books, two from somewhat fringy looking sources. I don't think it's enough for WP:AUTHOR, but even one properly published review of one of his other books might be enough to make me tilt the other way. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:43, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's no sign of WP:NPROF. WP:NAUTHOR is plausible, but the reviews that we've found at this time don't support it. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 22:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.