Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Date (Unix) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Unix_time#Command_line: best action due to merge. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 00:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Date (Unix)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unix commands are not notable. KDS4444^Talk 15:10, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unable to find sources that establish notability. APerson (talk!) 17:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Um, not to mention that this subject already went through an AFD discussion and was deleted then as well. KDS4444^Talk 23:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wow, the previous discussion was a year ago? Well, my opinions haven't changed, and neither has Wikipedia policy. We already have too many articles on trivial command line utilities, and we certainly don't need more. The most relevant policy here is WP:NOTHOWTO, and I don't see how we're going to avoid violating it with this article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merged to Unix_time#Command_line - I have boldly included a copy of this content in Unix_time. Fine to replace the article with a redirect now. Something that could be consdered WP:BEFORE deleting. ~Kvng (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Unix time § Command line, per the merge that was performed. This is necessary to retain attribution history. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:42, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per the logic of Kvng and Northamerica1000. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.