Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datacenter star audit
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 01:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Datacenter star audit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Corporate certification program. Article is entirely referenced to the program's own web site. Searching the web reveals no independent coverage. Seems to be non-notable. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 16:43, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete blatant spam. OSborn arfcontribs. 22:09, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment as the page has now been moved to Datacenter Star Audit (with capitalization), the redirect at the lowercase name and the article at the title case name should both be deleted, assuming the result of this discussion is to do so. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 13:29, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Tentative Keep - if references can be found for this, keep it, because it seems to be pretty important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wer900 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.