Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Database Nation
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn after article was nicely amended (non-admin closure). Ouro (blah blah) 16:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Database Nation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Some coverage, but I don't think it is enough for WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Merge/redirect or redirect to author is a possible WP:ATD. This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 10:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. This book does not have anything to do with music, not sure why the nominator mentions WP:MUSICBIO. This book satisfies WP:NBOOK. From Google Scholar, I found this, this, this, there are more. These sources are independent and are sufficient to establish the notability. Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 11:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Withdraw nomination per Deltaspace's comments - my error. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 15:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.