Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data designer
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Swarm we ♥ our hive 07:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Data designer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A woefully inadequate & unsourced artle(not per se grounds for deletion) but I am far from convinced that this profession truly exists other than as a nebulous concept. TheLongTone (talk) 14:21, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete There's some software with this name but I agree that the current content is not worth keeping. Andrew D. (talk) 18:16, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
*Delete I agree that the current content is not worth keeping. Katerina dunaway (talk) 03:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC) — Katerina dunaway (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sockpuppet of Sofiamar (talk • contribs).
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete It's hard to even stick the pin in this article there's so little there, and that so nebulous. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.