Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data center management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There's a general consensus that although the article needs cleanup, it is a notable topic per WP:GNG and should not be deleted. (non-admin closure) SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 15:57, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Data center management

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is some sort of notability in this article, but in it's current form it looks like an original review, related to specific companies. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:29, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article could be improved, but no doubt that this is a notable topic.Rathfelder (talk) 19:51, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The topic meets WP:GNG. Also, WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP; just because it needs work doesn't mean it should be deleted. Jmertel23 (talk) 13:12, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:36, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the topic itself is notable and while it is focused on a few companies, it's not focused in such a way to make it advertorial, just needing of improvement. Nosebagbear (talk) 01:28, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable topic, although could perhaps be covered in Data center. Deletion rationale not at all convincing. Not every perceived issue with an article requires an AfD. --Michig (talk) 08:50, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The topic meets WP:GNG. and WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP--DBig Xrayᗙ 13:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.