Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data Palette

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Poor writing is annoying to see in articles yes, but it's not a cause for deletion, just cleanup. Wizardman 05:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Data Palette

advertising Thru the night (talk) 04:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There may be COI issues here, but the product is notable, given the references in the article. --Eastmain (talk) 05:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Gary King (talk) 09:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why? This is consensus, not a vote. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 15:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Article reads like an adverisement, makes unfounded claims, most of the article merely copied from the corporate website. This is exactly the type of article that Wikipedia is not about. Should have been speedily deleted. Bardcom (talk) 15:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there are references indicating notability from reliable secondary sources. It is written as an advert, but this in itself just makes it a cleanup issue - Fritzpoll (talk) 23:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.