Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danni Quee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Expanded Universe. MBisanz ^talk 01:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danni Quee

non notable fictional character from the star wars expanded universe. prod was removed without any attempt to address it. Mission Fleg (talk) 02:19, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Danni Quee is notable for her success in aiding the war effort against the Yuuzhan Vong, especially for her considerable contributions of yammosk jamming, a technique that proved vital in deciding many battles in the New Republic's favor. In addition, she also participated considerably in the search for Zonama Sekot, an endeavor that surely was a deciding factor in the final book.Inigo1 (talk) 02:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any reliable sources? The only one in the article is to a wiki, which is not a reliable source. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 02:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Move to Star Wars Expanded Universe. Outside that universe, there is no notability. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:59, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as a secondary character. No evidence that there was even a suggestion to merge, before an attempt to delete it. DGG (talk) 03:34, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: Important within Expanded Universe, but not without it. TallNapoleon (talk) 05:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--If that were the criteria for merging, then Jaina Solo would not be a solo page.66.182.79.254 (talk) 23:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

frankly, I'd merge that one also-- Solo family perhaps. where we do justify an individual article is for her father. DGG (talk) 00:06, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:29, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:29, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.