Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyrusOne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:21, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CyrusOne

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On behalf of 2001:558:1418:0:0:5EFE:AA8:BFE9 (talk · contribs), no specific reason given. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep 25 data centres and counting, substantial coverage in the trade (financial and tech) press. Why delete? Andy Dingley (talk) 00:16, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 10. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 00:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Admittingly the article's somewhat lacking info but as always AFD isn't for cleanup purposes and as per Andy I see no valid reason to delete. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 03:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets WP:CORPDEPTH: [1], [2], [3], [4]. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.