Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyert and March
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shimeru 06:54, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Cyert and March (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article really appears to be a content fork. Although Richard Cyert and James G. March did work together, I can find no sources indicating that they worked together collectively under this name. All the information here is pretty much already covered in their respective articles. Erpert (let's talk about it) 20:41, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Not much more to say. Bearian (talk) 23:39, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nothing in the content that asserts a reason for a combined article. Off2riorob (talk) 02:56, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.