Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyclone Sigma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. A valid rationale for deletion has not been presented. For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone Sigma

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article only has one sentence. It is definitely too short. N-C16 (talk) 01:18, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Major cyclone which did substantial damage and is covered in tons of sources. We don't nominate notable articles for deletion because they're stubs. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Not a strong argument to delete. Subject is notable and covered in RS. Meatsgains (talk) 01:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.