Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cybo.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Kinu t/c 23:55, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Cybo.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
None of the sources provided prove notability per the guidelines for corporations, nor are they very useful for verification. They are either unreliable (like Crunchbase) or not about the website in question (Seattle PI). Steven Walling • talk 05:07, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I found one good source [1] but we'd need at least one more to establish notability. --Cerebellum (talk) 18:19, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's not a notable website. One source isn't enough to qualify as significant coverage. The notability of an article must be demonstrated by multiple secondary sources.--xanchester (t) 22:31, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 04:26, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails Wikipedia:Notability (web) and WP:CORPDEPTH. The link provided above by User:Cerebellum appears to be a promotional press release, or copied from one. Zero results in Google News archive per this search, other than the website itself. Additional searches for news and book sources did not yield coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:43, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.