Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyberoam Academy
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 23:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Cyberoam Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Written as an advertisement with no claim of notability samtar {t} 11:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete unless it's rewritten (which I'm not going to do): advertisement. I haven't bothered to check the notability. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 16:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- delete Spammy and poorly written. No indication to suggest that it's worth saving. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - An acceptable example of G11 not to mention, no obvious convincing notability here. SwisterTwister talk 07:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as an advertisement; I don't believe that notability is established here through sources. APerson (talk!) 17:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.