Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyberBunker (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:37, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CyberBunker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I assume this article was created because of the company relationship with The Pirate Bay. But it seems to lack independent coverage otherwise. The 1st AfD seems to have happened before Wikipedia had any notability standards. Pcap ping 14:04, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 14:04, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- When I saw this AfD I expected to find sources quite easily, but surprisingly there doesn't seem to be very much at all. Reyk _YO! 05:22, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

keep I do not know why the article was created, but the subject seems notable.Ref 1 is sufficient . DGG ( talk ) 21:19, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
keep subject is noteable and the article can be properly sourced (even if parts of the article would need to go). --hroest 00:21, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.