Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curve-controlled modeling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:06, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Curve-controlled modeling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A spammer listed this article in their Wikipedia Portfolio and considering that I suspect that the content is problematic. The only reliable source currently cited is this poorly cited paper. A search for other possible sources in google and gscholar only turned up this which clearly isn't much use. At present the subject doesn't appear to meet the GNG. SmartSE (talk) 23:07, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—Good nom; after poking around I don't have anything to add other than the cited recent patent may be what's driving the activity. Regardless, I'm not seeing coverage sufficient to establish notability. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 14:28, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see no evidence of RS for this topic independent of the author of the the term. Thus the topic fails notability criteria per WP:GNG. The article itself seems somewhat promotional of the technique. --Mark viking (talk) 18:51, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as found no evidence of any WP:Notability. –Davey2010 • (talk) 14:15, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.