Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cum catcher
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Cum catcher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:NOTDICTIONARY - term isn't notable enough on its own to merit an article separate from Soul patch. If anything, redirect there. Also, borderline WP:CSD#A10 since they're synonyms. XXX antiuser eh? 23:34, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is a vast collection of hits on Google Web Search, but they are not about beards and, er, cough, cough, not really reliable. Book Search comes up with The New Partridge Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English, which contradicts this article, so if we decide to redirect, it should be to Condom. Favonian (talk) 00:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete only source points to Urban Dictionary which is indicative that this is both a dictionary definition and not a particularly notable one. RFerreira (talk) 00:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (I had PRODded this article). Even if Wikipedia were a slang dictionary, which I'm happy to say it's not, this is not a particularly notable term and I haven't been able to verify the definition given. To the contrary, the various sources I can find indicate that "cum catcher" may variously mean a mustache, a promiscuous girl, or a condom. Glenfarclas (talk) 00:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above CTJF83 GoUSA 00:13, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.