Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CtrlS
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 23:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- CtrlS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Firstly, part of the article is lifted from http://www.varindia.com/July_ftf4.htm. Secondly, the author works for the marketing division of CtrlS, (https://plus.google.com/103025016624124730612/about), and the article appears to be unambiguous advertising. I nominate the article under, WP:CV and WP:ARTSPAM. Gsingh (talk) 17:13, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry the correct source appears to be from here, http://www.iba-banktech.com/2009/supportgroup.htm under the CtrlS entry, which was authored in 2009, well before the creation of this article. Gsingh (talk) 17:16, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Gsingh Kindly please guide me how to write an complete article, i dont know how to insert references properly. If you really believe you need to delete it please do it and write a better one, in that case you will have a good contribution from your end because i believe this article is relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivinvarghesemeleadan (talk • contribs) 05:06, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Company doesn't seem like it's notable for anything. Just a run of the mill cloud computing company, though probably larger than many. A lot of the sources are press releases, and though some other coverage exists it's not substantial. At best this article will serve as a corporate profile page. SÆdontalk 22:00, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:54, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.