Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowdspring (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — Jake Wartenberg 03:08, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Crowdspring (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Not notable? This article has been AfD-deleted before. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I recreated it because the company is notable as a google news search and the citations I added indicate. The article can be expanded, but it doesn't happen to be a subject I'm particularly interested in. The company has been covered by Business Week, Information Week and other reliable independent sources. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:17, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I'm not convinced all of the sourcing in the article is reliable. For example, the businessweek reference is to a company profile which is really part of a directory. But there is no doubt that they are the sole subject of Forbes, Information Week, and CNet articles. A Google news searfh turns up additional mentions such as CTV. -- Whpq (talk) 17:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.